One of the town council officers wrote in to request a meeting today. Of course the email already annoyed me by saying they want to meet with the 'cat lovers' and then over the phone he asked me if we knew ALL the people feeding cats in their town council and if the caregivers ' subcontracted' the feeding out. Clearly to the town council, if you like cats, you must ALL know each other. I told him that clearly we cannot know every feeder and that we work only with the responsible caregivers and not people who randomly litter.
He asked if there were passes to identify the caregivers and I said that the town council should definitely look into it, which made him backpedal quickly. He wants a way to identify caregivers but doesn't want to be the one who actually issues identification.
I find this strange in the extreme. If we like cats, then we must all know each other? What about everyone who owns a car? They must ALL be friends. Or worse, people who like to eat at the same restaurant - bosom buddies for life in the same logic. Or that ALL town council officers MUST be cat hating, lazy people. So if we don't subscribe to these other fallacies, then why are people who are volunteering to look after cats tarred with the same feather as people who are essentially littering?