Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Change in policy?

I just spoke with a caregiver who said that one of her sterilised cats was caught by mistake when the cats were trapped in her area. There is a persistent complainant there and I advised her to seek help from her MP.

On approaching the AVA to have her cat returned, she was allegedly told that the policy has now changed and that the AVA will not return tipped ear, sterilised cats unless the TC issues a letter to say that the cats may be returned. I have just written to the AVA to clarify. In the past of course, any sterilised cat could be returned - if the TC was agreeable, the cat would be returned. If the TC was not agreeable, the cat could still be released but had to be microchipped and could not be placed back on the street.

This does not mean that there will be increased trapping or an mass culling exercise. This does however mean that it may be very difficult for you to claim your cats if they are mistakenly caught and if the TC will not issue a letter to release the cats to you. Do be extra vigilant about your cats till we find out what is happening.

In theory, those caregivers who are already working with the TC will not be affected even if this new policy is true. For these caregivers, the TC would have first contacted them for help to handle the complaint. Failing that, the caregivers would either remove the cat or ask the TC to step in. As such, no sterilised cats will generally be caught. If a cat is caught by mistake, caregivers working with their TCs will generally already go to the TC and ask for a letter and the cat will be released without a microchip.

However this does have implications for caregivers who do not want to work with their TCs or whose TCs either do not want to work with them, or will not release these cats. They will then not be allowed to claim the cats even if they are sterilised.

It does also mean that it's even more imperative for caregivers to work with their TCs as we have been saying. I just had a feeder write in and tell me that she did not want to alert the TC to the fact that she was managing the cats there for fear of attracting unnecessary attention. She may in fact be achieving exactly what she does not want. She herself may not get the attention- but her cats may - and negative repercussions could follow if there are complaints and no caregiver that the TC knows of in the area.

Labels: ,

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

What new atrocity is this?? I can already forsee the kinds of problems this will cause. I pray that it is not true

4/4/07 4:12 PM  
Blogger Mary said...

If what AVA said is true, then they have to give ample time for the caregiver(s) and the TC(s) to approach them. Killing in this instance cannot be immediate or within their present time frame. As we know, not all TCs is going to support our stand against this killing and not all TCs will attend to such matter immediately.

4/4/07 4:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

this policy seems to be counter productive to AVA. now they have to give a longer grace period for the caregiver to notify the TC and for the TC to react. this wld mean housing and feeding the affected cats for a few days at least.

aside from AVA, it also seems to create more obstacles for everybody else down the line, from caregivers to TCs to pest control. how does this change benefit anybody?

and by all accounts, i thought that MPs, TCs and the AVA were becoming more receptive to measures other than euthanasia to control the stray cat population. what brought about this sudden turn of events?

4/4/07 5:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh god, the last thing we need is more useless bureaucratic procedures. What about those who live in private estates then?? What if you don't live in the area but want to redeem the cat?
THIS IS SUCH RUBBISH

4/4/07 11:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

SO BASICALLY THEY ARE MAKING IT EASY TO CATCH CATS BUT DIFFICULT TO RELEASE THEM.

4/4/07 11:54 PM  
Blogger Dawn said...

Anonymous - all good questions and we need to ask them to let us know.

5/4/07 12:25 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home